Is the Church Failing at Being the Church?

“Why do you evangelicals love to make up and say such bad things about yourselves?”

That’s how Ed Stetzer began his Foreword to Bradley Wright’s 2010 book Christians are Hate-Filled Hypocrites ... and Other Lies You’ve Been Told. The question, Stetzer explained, was posed to him while he was at the Washington Post building in Washington, D.C., to address a room full of reporters. Instead of believing the worst about ourselves and being overly concerned with how others perceive us, Stetzer encouraged people to read Wright’s book.

Wright argued that, despite many imperfections, evangelical Christianity in America “was doing a pretty good job of being the church.” In his blurb, Scot McKnight—who, in a much more dire mood, recently called for “Saving Evangelicalism”—urged everyone to buy the book, read it carefully, and give the book away to others because, he insisted, “there’s lots of good news when it comes to the condition of the church in the West.”

Evangelicals have a long history of self-flagellation. On one level, this is commendable. As Christians we should, of all people, be aware of our sins, repent of our sins, and ask God to help us overcome our sins. And yet, we must be careful lest the virtue of personal humility leads the church at large to believe things that aren’t true, develop responses that aren’t necessary, and set out on paths that aren’t wise. Granted, Wright’s book came out over a decade ago—before Obergefell, before Trump, before #MeToo, before Covid. Maybe evangelicals are finally right to believe the worst about ourselves. Or maybe we have tendency to reach big conclusions based on experiences and headlines more than on hard facts.

I’m not sure what to call the two sides (and I don’t even like describing the conversation as “sides”), but there is an important, and sometimes tense, conversation afoot in the evangelical world about whether the church and its leaders are quite often worse than we’ve dared to admit, or whether the church and its leaders are quite often unfairly criticized in a rush of “prophetic” denunciation. The two sides likely agree on what constitutes sinful leadership in the church: manipulation, lying, selfishness, the desire for vainglory, lack of accountability, a harsh spirit, demeaning words, angry behavior, and anything else that Paul lists under “works of the flesh” (Galatians 5:19-21). We usually know what sin looks like. What we don’t know is whether these sins are bigger and badder and more prevalent than ever before.

A few weeks ago, Christianity Today published a list of its top stories from the past year. Several observers pointed out that most of the articles on the list had to do with scandals and controversies in the church. It is easy to deduce from the most popular podcasts and headlines that the evangelical church is suffering from an epidemic of abusive pastors, deviant churches, and fallen leaders.
Before we denounce most leaders as Pharisees and large swaths of the church as complicit in the evil deeds of darkness, let’s make sure we are not trafficking in well-meaning, but unhelpful, myths.

But do we know that this is the case? That’s an honest question. Maybe there is hard data out there showing that our problems are much worse than they use to be and that our sins are much worse than anywhere else in the world. But absent that data, we should not make sweeping conclusions based entirely on powerful anecdotes and personal experiences.

The problem is not with calling out sin where it exists. The problem comes when we implement grand plans and stir up new suspicions that may not be warranted. For example, in his book, Wright looks at sexual misconduct by clergy. Given the (then) well-publicized sins of Jim Bakker, Jimmy Swaggart, and Ted Haggard, along with detailed reporting from mainstream media outlets of lesser-known cases, it seemed obvious that sexual advances made by clergy was a pervasive problem. But according to research cited by Wright, only 1 in 33 churchgoing women reported that a religious leader had made a sexual advance to them.

Obviously, such behavior on the part of pastors should never be tolerated. Wright’s point was not to excuse the 3 percent but to make clear that 3 percent is not a lot considering that 1 in 4 women reported inappropriate sexual attention from authorities in non-religious workplaces. Similarly, Wright showed that instances of domestic abuse declined significantly among those who attended church weekly.

There are a number of issues Christians may not agree on when it comes to discussing moral failure in the church. We don’t always agree on what to call these sins (e.g., when does “sin” become “abuse” or “trauma”?). We don’t always agree on how to deal with serious sin when it surfaces in the church (e.g., when should we call in outside investigators and experts?). Most of all, I don’t think we are at all clear how often these types of sins are happening in the church.

There are nearly 400,000 churches in America, so there will always be plenty of bad examples to go around, and the bigger the denomination or movement the quicker the numbers will multiply. But before we denounce most leaders as Pharisees and large swaths of the church as complicit in the evil deeds of darkness, let’s make sure we are not trafficking in well-meaning, but unhelpful, myths. We don’t always have to believe the worst about ourselves (especially when the “ourselves” usually means “not me personally”). We can tackle problems somewhere without assuming they are problems everywhere.